[ecis2016.org] The SC has asked a panel headed by justice SN Dhingra, to proceed with the auction of Unitech Ltd’s unencumbered properties in Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, within six weeks, to refund money to home buyers
The Supreme Court, on July 5, 2018, asked a panel headed by former Delhi High Court judge, justice SN Dhingra, to proceed with the auction of real estate major Unitech Ltd’s unencumbered properties at Agra and Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh and Sriperumbudur in Tamil Nadu, to refund money to home buyers. The top court had earlier set up the three-member panel, for the ‘expeditious’ auction of over 600 acres of land of the real estate firm, for refunding money to home buyers who do not want possession of their homes or flats. A bench headed by chief justice Dipak Misra, also directed Unitech Ltd to submit a list of all properties of the company, its subsidiaries and personal properties of all the directors, on July 9, 2018.
You are reading: SC asks justice Dhingra panel to auction Unitech’s properties in UP, TN
Read also : Prestige Estates to take over Ariisto Developers’ stalled Mumbai project
The bench, also comprising justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud, asked the justice Dhingra panel to complete the process of auctioning the land properties of the firm at Agra, within four weeks. It asked the panel to conclude auctioning of the properties in Varanasi and Sriperumbudur within six weeks. The court was intimated by the panel that it was making efforts, to ensure that the auctioning fetches a ‘good price’.
[ecis2016.org] SC sets up panel to auction Unitech’s properties
Meanwhile, the Income Tax Department moved the apex court, for making itself a party in the ongoing litigation, claiming that the real estate firm owed it Rs 950 crores as tax. Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, appearing for the firm, said it also wanted to sell the properties at Bengaluru. The court then asked the justice Dhingra committee, to undertake the exercise of valuation of the Bengaluru properties in 10 days. The bench asked lawyer lawyer Pawanshree Agarwal, who is assisting the court as the amicus curiae and the counsel for the real estate firm, to sit together for verification of the home buyers and their actual claims for refund.
Read also : What can home buyers do, under RERA, if agreements don’t mention possession dates
The court did not pass any order on the submission that Sanjay Chandra, the MD of the firm and his brother Ajay Chandra, who are in jail, be allowed to come out, so that they can arrange funds to refund the home buyers. The bench sought the firm’s response on the allegations of some home buyers, who were allowed to take possession of their flats on an ‘as is where is basis’ that the high-rise buildings have neither lifts, nor water or power back-up. The bench posted the bail plea of Chandra for further hearing on July 16, 2018.
The court had set up the justice Dhingra panel, asking it to nominate a chartered accountant and a valuer in the committee, for speedy auction of over 600 acres of unencumbered land of the firm. Unitech Ltd had given a list of its unencumbered land properties located at Agra, Varanasi, Bengaluru and Sriperumbudur near Chennai. Prior to this, the apex court had asked all directors of Unitech Ltd and its subsidiaries, to furnish details of their personal assets and warned them that if Rs 100 crores was not deposited by May 11, 2018, their assets would be auctioned. Sanjay Chandra, the MD, is seeking interim bail from the apex court after the Delhi High Court, on August 11, 2017, had rejected the plea in a criminal case lodged in 2015 by 158 home buyers of Unitech projects – ‘Wild Flower Country’ and ‘Anthea Project’ – situated in Gurugram in Haryana.
Source: https://ecis2016.org/.
Copyright belongs to: ecis2016.org
Source: https://ecis2016.org
Category: Lifestyle
