[ecis2016.org] The Uttar Pradesh Sunni Waqf Board has been asked by the Supreme Court, to show documents signed by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan, to prove its claim that it owns the iconic Taj Mahal
A Supreme Court bench headed by chief justice Dipak Misra, on April 11, 2018, asked the counsel for the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Waqf Board, to show it documents to substantiate the board’s claim that Shah Jahan, who had built the Taj Mahal in the memory of his wife Mumtaz Mahal in 1631, had executed a ‘waqfnama’ in favour of the board. A waqfnama is a deed or a document, through which a person expresses intention to donate a property or land for charitable purposes or waqf.
You are reading: SC asks Waqf Board to show signed documents of Shah Jahan on Taj Mahal
Read also : Ambernath east property market: An overview
[ecis2016.org] Encroachers evicted from 12 out of 990 Waqf properties: Delhi HC told
“Who in India will believe that it (Taj) belongs to the Waqf Board,” asked the bench, which also comprised justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud and added that such issues must not waste the time of the apex court. When the Waqf Board counsel told the court that Shah Jahan had himself declared it a Waqf property, the bench asked the board to show it the original deed executed by the Mughal emperor. “Show us the signature,” the CJI told the counsel, who then sought more time to produce relevant documents.
The court was hearing a 2010 appeal filed by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), over the ownership of the historic monument against the Waqf Board’s decision to declare the Taj Mahal as its property. The bench also asked the counsel how Shah Jahan could sign a document, when he was imprisoned by his son Aurangzeb at the Agra Fort in 1658, after a bitter war of succession. Shah Jahan died in 1666 in the fort itself.
Read also : Chennai Metro: All you need to know about the CMRL network
It told the counsel that the 17th century monument and other heritage structures, built by the Mughals, were taken over by the British, after the Mughal rule. After India’s independence, the monuments came under the government of India and were being managed by the ASI. The ASI counsel also maintained that there was no waqfnama. The court posted the matter for further hearing, on April 17, 2018.
Another bench of the apex court is also seized of a matter related to the Taj Mahal, in which the petitioner has sought directions to protect the structure, from the ill-effects of polluting gases and deforestation in and around the area. The top court has been monitoring the development in the area to protect the Taj Mahal, which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
Source: https://ecis2016.org/.
Copyright belongs to: ecis2016.org
Source: https://ecis2016.org
Category: Lifestyle
