SC stays NCLT order allowing centre to take over Unitech Ltd

[] The Supreme Court has stayed the December 8, 2017, order of the company law tribunal NCLT that allowed the centre to take over the management of embattled realty firm Unitech Limited

A Supreme Court bench comprising chief justice Dipak Misra and justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud, on December 13, 2017, stayed the National Company Law Tribunal’s (NCLT’s) order that allowed the centre to take over the management of Unitech Limited. The bench considered the statement of attorney general KK Venugopal that the government should not have moved the NCLT, when the apex court was seized of the matter.

You are reading: SC stays NCLT order allowing centre to take over Unitech Ltd

The apex court, which had, on December 12, 2017, expressed unhappiness over the Centre’s move to approach the NCLT, said the stay on the company law tribunal’s order, would meet the ends of justice. The top court had asked the centre why it had not taken the apex court’s permission to move the NCLT, for suspension of Unitech’s directors and their substitution by government nominees.

Read also : Delhi’s Signature Bridge project receives additional funds for completion

[] NCLT should have taken our leave: SC on government takeover of Unitech

Senior lawyers Mukul Rohatgi and Ranjit Kumar, appearing for the real estate firm and its promoters, had said that the apex court had given time to Unitech chief Sanjay Chandra, to negotiate from jail to sell assets, to generate Rs 750 crores for refunding money to home buyers but, in the meantime, the centre has approached the NCLT. Rohatgi had claimed that the NCLT did not issue notice to the firm and its directors and passed the interim order, which was virtually a final order and allowed the centre to take over the firm.

Earlier, the apex court had agreed to hear the appeal of Unitech Limited, challenging the NCLT order allowing the centre to take over its management. The NCLT, on December 8, 2017, had suspended all the eight directors of the realty firm, over allegations of mismanagement and siphoning of funds and had authorised the centre to appoint its 10 nominees on the board. The NCLT order had come after the centre moved the panel, with a view to protect the interests of nearly 20,000 home buyers. Unitech alleged that the takeover of the management of the company by the centre, would make it difficult for them to deposit Rs 750 crores as directed by the apex court, to safeguard the interests of home buyers.

Sanjay Chandra, head of the embattled real estate group, was asked on October 30, 2017, by the apex court, to deposit Rs 750 crores with it by December end, for the sake of the home buyers. The apex court had on October 30 said Chandra will be granted bail, only after the real estate group deposited the money with its registry.

Read also : CRISIL advises caution on home loans to businessmen, as NPAs double

Chandra’s lawyer had told the apex court that he has been required to be produced in various courts, consumer forum and commissions on a regular basis, which hampered his endeavour to arrange money and hence, the production warrants issued against him by various judicial bodies be stayed for 15 days. He had also said that the accused be allowed to appear in courts through his lawyers. The plea was declined. The apex court had also clarified that its earlier order, directing all courts below not to take any coercive action against the accused for the time being, would also be made applicable on all forums including state and national consumer commissions.

The top court had earlier directed jail authorities to facilitate Chandra’s meeting with his company officials and lawyers, so that he could arrange money to refund home buyers, as well as for completing the ongoing housing projects. It had said that if any proceedings were pending against Chandra and the company, those may continue and the final order be passed but no coercive steps be taken to execute those orders.

Chandra was seeking interim bail from the apex court, after the Delhi High Court on August 11, 2017, had rejected the plea in a criminal case lodged in 2015 by 158 home buyers of Unitech projects – ‘Wild Flower Country’ and ‘Anthea Project’ – in Gurugram.

Copyright belongs to:

Category: Lifestyle

Debora Berti

Università degli Studi di Firenze, IT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button