Lifestyle

Bombay HC fines MHADA for usurping land in Juhu

[ecis2016.org] The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, along with a private trust and two societies, were fined Rs 2 lakhs each by the Bombay High Court, for trying to illegally usurp two plots in suburban Juhu, reserved for open garden space

A Bombay High Court bench of justices BR Gavai and Riyaz Chagla, on July 19, 2017, imposed a fine and quashed a March 2017 order of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), for executing a lease deed by which two plots admeasuring 2,000 sq metres and 1,687 sq yards in suburban Juhu, were to be handed over to Anjuman Trust and other societies to construct residential complexes. The court ordered that the two plots be kept as open garden space and said no construction can be permitted on these two plots.

You are reading: Bombay HC fines MHADA for usurping land in Juhu

The bench also imposed a fine of Rs 2 lakhs each on MHADA, Anjuman Trust, Juhuraj Society and Juhu Lifestyle Society, while disposing of a plea by a city-based civil society, ‘Save Open Spaces’, which challenged the order passed by MHADA.

Read also : One year of GST: What were the gains and losses

“As it is, the city is having very few open spaces, which are the lungs of the city. We have no hesitation in holding that an attempt to destroy the open spaces meant for a garden with ulterior motive, would be violative of the doctrine of public trust,” the court said.

[ecis2016.org] MHADA areas to be redeveloped by charging only premium

“We are of the considered view that MHADA ought not to have been party to such a collusive and illegal act between Anjuman Trust, Juhuraj Society and Juhu Lifestyle Society,” the court said. It added that the hasty manner in which the lease deeds were executed in favour of the societies by MHADA, creates a great degree of suspicion.

Read also : Biodiversity parks along the Yamuna, in a phased manner: DDA to NGT

The petitioners’ counsel, Shiraz Rustomjee, argued that the plot was reserved for garden space and hence, MHADA cannot allot the same to any trust to build residential societies there. The petitions had sought the court to declare that the two plots were necessarily required to be kept as open space for garden and the lease deed executed, in favour of Juhuraj Society and Juhu Lifestyle Society as nominees of Anjuman Trust, should be quashed and set aside.

The court noted that there were some errors on the part of MHADA, while submitting the layout plans of Juhu area to the civic body in the year 1999. “It appears that this error while submitting the amended layout plan, must have ignited an ingenious idea in the mind of some land grabbers, so as to turn this obvious error into a gold mine. The land grabbers then started making an attempt to grab these two pieces of land,” the court said.

The court also noted that despite MHADA sending a letter to the BMC later, to rectify the error and declare the two plots as open spaces in the layout plan, the then vice-president and CEO of MHADA, SS Zende, went ahead and passed an order to execute the lease deed. “As an officer of MHADA, Zende was expected to act in a manner, which would have protected the rights of MHADA or the public at large, rather than showing the magnanimity of handing over such a precious piece of land to Anjuman Trust, without the state government or the MHADA getting a single rupee benefit,” the bench observed. The petitioners told the court they do not want the fine amount and the same should be donated to the State Legal Aid Fund.

Source: https://ecis2016.org/.
Copyright belongs to: ecis2016.org

Source: https://ecis2016.org
Category: Lifestyle

Debora Berti

Università degli Studi di Firenze, IT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button