[ecis2016.org] A Delhi court has extended, by one month, the interim bail granted to Unitech Ltd promoter Sanjay Chandra, in a fraud case relating to a Gurugram-based real estate project
Additional sessions judge Virender Kumar Goyal, on July 10, 2017, extended the interim bail granted to Unitech Ltd promoter Sanjay Chandra, till August 9, on a personal bond of Rs 70 lakhs. While extending the three months’ interim bail granted to Chandra on April 10, 2017, the court also directed him to settle at least 7-10 cases a week, to expedite the settlement pending against remaining consumers, in its Gurugram-based real estate project.
You are reading: Court extends Unitech Ltd promoter’s interim bail
Read also : BhuNaksha Rajasthan: Know everything about it
[ecis2016.org] Have complied with order, deposited interest: Unitech to SC
During the hearing, advocate Vijay Agarwal, told the court that in the last three months, the matter was settled with 30 consumers out of 109, which was 2.5 consumers per week. The court, however, imposed various conditions on the accused, including asking him not to leave the country without permission and not to hamper with the ongoing probe.
The court had, on April 10, 2017, granted a three-month interim bail to Chandra. Earlier, on April 1, 2017, it sent Chandra to police custody, after the prosecution said that his custodial interrogation was required, to find out the alleged money trail, beneficiaries of the transactions and recovery of project-related documents and other evidence.
Read also : HC tells Mumbai police to suggest measures to ease traffic in market areas
The case was registered on July 31, 2015, in compliance of a July 27, 2015 order passed by a Delhi court, on the complaint of Delhi residents Arun Bedi and his mother Urmila Bedi. They had alleged that they were induced by the firm to book a flat in August 2011, in the residential project named ‘Wild Flowers Country’ in Gurugram, for a total consideration of Rs 57.34 lakhs. They had alleged that after passage of the given period, the builder had not delivered the possession, adding that the firm, in connivance with others, cheated the public at large.
Later, 90 more complaints were received against the firm for the same project, which were clubbed with the present FIR. The police claimed that around Rs 363 crores was collected by the firm, of which over Rs 35 crores was received from 91 complainants who were part of the present complaint.
Source: https://ecis2016.org/.
Copyright belongs to: ecis2016.org
Source: https://ecis2016.org
Category: Lifestyle
