Lifestyle

Home buyers of Amrapali move SC, seek safeguarding of their interests

[ecis2016.org] Over 100 home buyers, who had booked units in the Amrapali Group’s projects, have moved the Supreme Court seeking protection of their rights, after insolvency proceedings were initiated against the builder on a plea by Bank of Baroda

Over 100 hassled home buyers, who had booked dream homes with Amrapali Group firms, on September 20, 2017, moved the Supreme Court, seeking that their interests be safeguarded by treating them as secured creditors, like banks and financial institutions. The home buyers, who have neither got possession of flats, nor refund of their hard-earned invested money, had booked homes in the Amrapali Centurion Park-Low Rise project, Amrapali Centurion Park-Terrace Homes and Amrapali Centurion Park-Tropical Garden at Greater Noida in Uttar Pradesh. More than 5,000 flats were to be built in approximately 40 towers, in a phased manner by the embattled group.

You are reading: Home buyers of Amrapali move SC, seek safeguarding of their interests

The fresh plea, filed by Bikram Chatterjee and 106 others, has sought quashing of a National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) order, passed on the plea of Bank of Baroda, seeking initiation of insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Amrapali Silicon City Pvt Ltd. Consumer and recovery cases and decrees passed by civil courts and consumer fora in favour of home buyers against real estate firms, cannot be executed once insolvency proceedings begin at the NCLT. The plea has sought that either the home buyers are treated equally with banks and FIs, or the provisions of the bankruptcy code, which give priority to lending institutions, be held ultra vires to the constitution as being violative of fundamental rights like right to equality and right to life.

Read also : Top 5 mistakes to avoid when investing in commercial real estate

[ecis2016.org] SC allows home buyers to intervene in Jaypee insolvency matter

The petition, filed through lawyer ML Lahoty, alleged that the 107 home buyers had neither got possession of the property, nor any compensation from the firm. It also alleged that the insolvency proceedings against Amrapali Silicon City Ltd, affected the home buyers of Amrapali Centurian Park Pvt Ltd. It claimed that thousands of buyers had booked apartments during 2010-14, by paying booking amounts running into several crores after which they were made to sign ‘one-sided’ allotment agreements. Detesting the terms and conditions contained in the agreement, the buyers alleged they were ‘oppressive and unreasonable’, as there was a clause for timely payment by the buyer, but no timely completion of the project. It claimed that the contract was one-sided, as it allowed the builder to raise loan from any bank by way of mortgage of the flats being sold and buyers could not object.

“Giving a serious jolt to home buyers, who have paid their hard earned money and life savings into funding the purchase of their dream homes, the Respondents 3 and 4 (Amrapali) were found in serious breach of their obligation to deliver the flats within 36 months, i.e., by 2013 and in some cases it is 2016,” the petition said. No compensation for this failure to deliver the flats had been paid to the buyers, it alleged.

Read also : Bhu Naksha Rajasthan: Know everything about it

The NCLT had on September 4, 2017, ordered liquidation of the builder on the plea of Bank of Baroda, seeking initiation of the same under the Bankruptcy Act. Besides two Amrapali firms, the plea has made the Union Ministries of Finance and Corporate Affairs, the Uttar Pradesh government, Bank of Baroda and the RBI as parties. The plea has sought a direction, restraining the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) from creating any third party interest in the projects in question and safeguarding of financial interests of home buyers.

Earlier, the apex court had taken note of a similar plea of hassled home buyers of real estate major Jaypee Infratech Ltd and revived the insolvency proceedings against the firm. It had given the management control of the firm to the IRP, appointed by the NCLT, besides asking the firm to deposit Rs 2,000 crores with the apex court registry, to safeguard the interest of the home buyers.

Source: https://ecis2016.org/.
Copyright belongs to: ecis2016.org

Source: https://ecis2016.org
Category: Lifestyle

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button