Lifestyle

SC junks Hotel Leela’s plea, directs it to pay Rs 258 crores to AAI

[ecis2016.org] The Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal by Hotel Leela Venture Ltd and asked it to pay Rs 258 crores to the Airports Authority of India as royalty, for possession of its property near Mumbai Airport

A Supreme Court bench, comprising justices RF Nariman and Navin Sinha, on February 5, 2018, junked an appeal filed by Hotel Leela, challenging an order of the division bench of the Delhi High Court, which ordered Hotel Leela Venture Ltd to pay Rs 258 crores to the Airports Authority of India (AAI) as royalty. The Supreme Court held that there was no infirmity in the High Court order and the appeal filed by Hotel Leela Venture lacked merit. “The special leave petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of,” the bench said.

You are reading: SC junks Hotel Leela’s plea, directs it to pay Rs 258 crores to AAI

AAI, which owned 29,000 sq metres of land near Mumbai Airport, had leased two parcels measuring 9,000 sq metres each, to Leela Scottish Lace Ltd and Leela Venture Limited. The remaining 11,000 sq metres, was initially given on a license to Leela. The dispute relates to the 11,000 sq metres of land, which was leased to Leela in February 1996 for a period of 30 years, for adding a wing of 150 rooms to the existing hotel.

Read also : Crowdfunding: Can it work in Indian real estate?

The High Court had, in November 2016, upheld its single judge’s decision, asking Hotel Leela Venture Ltd to pay Rs 258 crores to the AAI as royalty. Hotel Leela had moved the division bench, challenging the single judge’s July 15, 2016 verdict, setting aside the arbitration award in favour of Leela Venture in 2012. The arbitration award had declared that payment of royalty by Leela had become impossible and therefore, the parties may enter into a new contract in relation to possession of the property. The arbitrator had discharged Leela from liability of paying the royalty. While dismissing Leela’s plea, the division bench had said, “The award is perverse and is liable to be set aside.”

Source: https://ecis2016.org/.
Copyright belongs to: ecis2016.org

Source: https://ecis2016.org
Category: Lifestyle

Debora Berti

Università degli Studi di Firenze, IT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button