Lifestyle

Was land allotted to Patanjali for food park: HC asks Noida Authority

[ecis2016.org] The Allahabad High Court has asked the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority, if any land was allotted to yoga guru Ramdev’s firm Patanjali Ayurved Ltd, directly or indirectly, for setting up a food park and sought details if it was done

The Allahabad High Court has asked the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA) to provide all the records showing details of allotment of land in favour of Baba Ramdev’s Patanjali Ayurved Ltd and such other company or firm or industry that directly or indirectly relates to Patanjali Ayurved Ltd, along with maps. The bench, comprising justices Tarun Agarwala and Ajay Bhanot, also issued a notice to Patanjali Ayurved Ltd, on a petition by a man named Ausaf and others of Gautam Budh Nagar, who challenged the alleged allotment of 400 acres of land in favour of Patanjali Ayurved Ltd in Noida.

You are reading: Was land allotted to Patanjali for food park: HC asks Noida Authority

Read also : Kolkata announces housing project, for those with monthly earning of Rs 30,000 and lesser

[ecis2016.org] HC bars work on Noida land allotted to Ramdev’s Patanjali

The court has fixed November 14, 2017, for the next hearing in the case.

Read also : Can budget 2017 compensate for demonetisation’s impact on realty?

The petitioners alleged that they were allotted land on lease, for plantation of trees in 1994 for 30 years, but now that land was allotted illegally by YEIDA to Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. During the course of hearing, the Yamuna Expressway Authority said neither its officers went to cut down trees, nor any tree existed on the spot. However, the state government in its affidavit, stated that the authority’s officers went to the disputed land to cut the trees and at least 300 trees are there.

“It seems that cover-up operations are going on. Neither the government, nor the authority is ready to answer whose JCB machines were used to pull down trees,” the court had observed on an earlier date. Earlier, the court had directed the parties concerned, not to make any development or changes in the land in dispute, till the next order.

Source: https://ecis2016.org/.
Copyright belongs to: ecis2016.org

Source: https://ecis2016.org
Category: Lifestyle

Debora Berti

Università degli Studi di Firenze, IT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button