[ecis2016.org] The Bombay High Court has pulled up the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, for not initiating action against a city-based developer, which failed to pay transit rent to the tenants of a building taken up for redevelopment
A division bench of the Bombay High Court, of justices RM Savant and Sadhana Jadhav, on August 1, 2017, pulled up the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), for its failure to comply with the orders passed by the high court last year, regarding the payment of transit rent by Shree Swami Samarth Builders to the tenants of a building that was taken for redevelopment. The HC also alluded that the MHADA officers may be in collusion with the developer and hence, may not be complying with the court’s orders.
You are reading: Bombay HC raps MHADA for inaction against builder, over lacunae in redevelopment
Read also : Delhi HC considering a stay on property conversions that do not adhere to master plan
[ecis2016.org] Bombay HC fines MHADA for usurping land in Juhu
“We know how such things work. I am 100 per cent sure that the MHADA officers might be sitting in the evening with the builders and having drinks,” justice Savant remarked. The court was hearing a petition filed by Sameer Patil, the tenant of building Samarth Krupa, seeking directions to the builder to pay him rent arrears of over Rs 8.24 lakhs.
According to the plea, the building, located on a prime plot at the junction of Gokhale Road and Ranade Road in Dadar, was demolished in 2010 and proposed to be redeveloped. However, the construction work was abruptly stopped by the builder in 2014. After that, the builder even refused to pay the transit rent to the tenants.
Read also : Home insurance vs home loan insurance
The high court had, in October 2016, directed MHADA to initiate action against the builder and also attach the builder’s properties and recover the transit rent. The court had then even suggested that MHADA take acquisition of the building and complete the construction. However, in the latest hearing, the petitioner informed the high court that till date, MHADA had not initiated any action.
The high court then issued a final notice to the builder. The court said that if by the next date, the builder was not represented by a lawyer, the court would issue a non-bailable warrant. The court posted the matter for further hearing on August 10, 2017. Nearly 73 tenants, including 16 shop owners, of the Samarth Krupa building had agreed to the redevelopment. The MHADA had issued a commencement certificate for a ground-plus-10-storey building in 2010.
Source: https://ecis2016.org/.
Copyright belongs to: ecis2016.org
Source: https://ecis2016.org
Category: Lifestyle
